C (0-2 points) | B (3-4 points) | A (4-5 points) | |
Form | Unorganized and difficult to follow;Uses only one form of documentation (text, image, video etc.); Form of documentation has no relation to form of product | Organized and able to be followed; Used more than one mode of documentation; Form of documentation considers form of product | Well organized and easy to follow; Uses a variety of modes of documentation, Form of documentation balances with the form of product |
Content | No evidence of personal/artistic growth; No personal voice is shown; No plan or direction | Evidence of little personal/artistic growth; Has personal voice; Too little or too much planning | Evidence of personal/artistic growth; Displays a distinct personal voice; Process has direction but remains open-ended |
Group Work | Does not consider the advice of group members nor gives advice to others; No evidence of consistent group interaction | Considers advice of group members, Gives some help to group members, Little evidence of consistent group interaction | Considers and uses advice of group members, Gives help to group members, Evidence of consistent group interaction throughout entire project |
Use of Technology | The documentation does not make any attempt to include technology related media skills or address virtual space/social networks themes | The documentation does addresses digital themes, and includes only one (but not both) of the following: 1) technology themes about digitalness 2)technology practice within virtual space and/or a social network | The documentation includes both digital themes surrounding social networks and virtual space as well as the use of a virtual space or social network to produce the final product |
Rubric
This rubric will assess how well we document our art-making process.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)